Showing posts with label Just for fun. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Just for fun. Show all posts

Saturday, October 24, 2015

Unrelated: The Importance of Gender in Horror

I am a HUGE movie buff, and particularly am a fan of horror. Part of the reason I'm not blogging every day right now is because of how much time I'm contributing to my annual horror fest. (Really, with local Frank Vatrano, the Moose and Falcons winless, you would think I would be talking more about that, but no...)

One of the big things in modern horror has been the gender politics. Really, its one of the more interesting things about the genre. That and the fact that the heroes are often the villains, and that often horror is just dark comedy in disguise, but that can be different discussions. 


Early on, monster movies were predominantly male driven, often science fiction with damsels in distress, then as we all know the story, Halloween came on to the scene (Though more accurately, Black Christmas and Texas Chainsaw Massacre,) and the Slasher genre was born. Halloween did a lot right, and it set the pace for a formula that would be come the standard about two years later when the Slasher boom was on with Friday the 13th and Prom Night honing in on that formula. More surprising, it became the genre standard even beyond slashers. See: Alien


If we start breaking down a lot of the hit horror movies post Halloween, there is no doubt a huge trend towards the "Final Girl" trope. The Final Girl trope is the trope horror has built its name on now, but it is the house bad horror is built upon. Let's take a look at some of the more successful modern horror titles since and see if the trend can hold.:

Nightmare on Elm Street: 2 Male, 2 Female, Female hero
Evil Dead: 3 Female, 2 Male, Male hero
Faculty: 3 female, 3 male, male hero
Alien: 2 female, 5 male, female hero, male top-billed
Hellraiser: 2 female, 2 male, female hero
The Thing: All male cast
Final Destination: Male hero in one, female in two.
Scream: 3 female, 4 male, female hero

Am I cherry picking a bit? Probably, but the point is good horror isn't necessarily built on the trope. When it is a female lead, it isn't usually a ditz either. Nancy in Nightmare reads up on self defense and home built traps. Ripley is a tough, often by the books co-captain who almost prevents the Xenomorph from ever getting on the ship.

Again, all well known, why is this important?

We are out of the slasher era and moving into an era dictated by remakes (and a huge influx of found footage films). Two films on that list above, The Thing and Evil Dead have shifted the gender of their heroes and cast from male heroes to female heroes and its sexist. Let me revise that, the final girl trope is sexist as a whole. Ok, digging myself deeper. Why don't I just let Joss Whedon and Drew Goddard explain for me:

"The virgin's death is optional, as long as it's last. The main thing is that she suffers."
-Cabin in the Woods

The way Hollywood utilizes the Final Girl trope isn't about empowering female, or writing smart women in general. It's about victimizing women for our entertainment. On top of it, its usually a sign of lazy writing. The Thing reboot was exhibit A. They threw a female lead in there because of genre expectations. Male characters can also be poorly written, but aren't usually subjected to the same psycho-sexual torture female characters are subjected to. (Alien being a great exception and example of this since John Hurt is more or less a rape victim in it, plus phallic Alien. It's kinda a movie about a rape victim beating rape, but not a la I Spit on Your Grave.) 

Furthermore, in order to defeat a monster in a horror movie, characters have to over come their flaws and weaknesses. That is what makes a good character in any movie, and by extension a good movie. Male characters often are put in their situation because of transgressions. See: Saw. Female characters are in their situation usually because they're female. Usually an initial encounter is escaped through luck. The flaw they have to overcome is being female. (Halloween was a little guilty of this too.) That isn't good writing, it isn't good horror. 

Again, I don't want all male led horror movies. I want horror to take off the training wheels and understand that it can utilize gender better for the messages in its movies, and be real horror. Good horror as gender balance and when it does it right it is perhaps the most progressive genre. It is frustrating to see how all the examples listed above could get it correct, and then they feed it it into the money machine, it changes around  and remove that balance, or not see that it has to exist. 

Is it really something that is all too important? Not really, silly movies usually. But hey, it's tropes, trends, and something worth noticing and thinking about. The more the audience thinks, the better our movies can get. 

Monday, October 12, 2015

Unrelated: LUEser

This is published post #42. For those of you who don't know, this number is very important. It is the answer to life the universe and everything. As to what the question is, nobody really knows.

Creative Commons: Darla
This is the point in time where I recommend Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, either the book or the radio broadcast, not the movie. So rarely does one find a piece of literature so optimistic and joyful while being entrenched in nhilistic absurdist philosophy (save for maybe Vonnegut, but even still he's much darker). At least as optimistic and joyful a book can be while still having earth destroyed within the first hundred or so pages.

The book series is chaos theory start to finish, where the random and the insanity get set to the march of Humanity. When humanity gets boiled down to its simplest form it gets exposed for how silly it all is. It's what good observational humor does and HHG2G has some of the best around. In it it explains why a miracle fish disproves god's existence by proving his existence, how the universe has a population of zero, and the importance of telephone sanitizers.

Is there a point to this blog other than me saying to read a book series I've been enthralled with since a kid? No. Do I wish I could do a better tribute to it? Yes. But sometimes I just need to let  it be.

Thursday, September 17, 2015

AHL Twitter Wars: Celebrities, Smackdown and NHL 16 ratings

Figured I would check in with AHL Twitter to see how things were going. Any new chirps, or beefs? Anything of interest? Ok, so the Hamilton Bulldogs keep talking up something. They've been scorned by the AHL and re-aligned with the OHL, lets see how they're handling the transistion...




Yup, that is a burn and  half. That's the equivalent of breaking up with someone and then the next day they have new arm candy that happens to be a model / astrophysicist. "Fine, you don't want us in the AHL? Whatever, we still got Tom Hanks and Martin short doing promotional bits for us."

Wait... You mean the Bulldogs are really St. Johns now, and the Ontario Team is just some old OHL team renamed? Why is this all so complicated!?!

Anyway, obligatory Hartford Wolf Pack / Springfield Falcons.




Admittedly, I had a hand in this one, but they took the ball and ran with it. But Springfield, what are you doing? You have a video saying vs Hartford games don't sell as well as vs Providence! That's when you chirp back with  something like "It's cute how Hartford thinks its a rival when they don't sell as well. #irrelevant" or something like that. Instead your response is...




But that's fine, it works. It basically says "We'll do our talking on the ice. We're coming for you."  Which is good. Certainly better than how the Checkers and Ice Caps "Smack talk"




What I left out was all the talk about who had better fried chicken. No. Seriously.

Clean it up guys.

I know I talk about how much the Crunch fight, but it seems like most of the Phantoms countdown images involve fights...







Oh, and #isitoctoberyet memes and gifs keep flying in.




And with the release of NHL 16, there were a lot of tweets going out about that. The best is the following exchange:




I'm sure there were more highlights I'm missing but they got drowned out in a lot of rookie tournament action going

Friday, September 4, 2015

Classifieds

Your team here:
Image courtesy of Wade Dubielewicz creative commons
Wanted: Married White Male, fit but short, seeks an AHL team to root for. Specifically 4 to ranked. One from each division, a primary for each conference and one team to take overall top spot. Canidates will be chosen and ranked upon the following criteria:


  • Entertainment value
  • Skill
  • Ability to trash talk opponent in public forums
  • Clear defined rival
  • Ability to win and go all the way
  • Fan rapport
  • History or willingness to build history
  • Attitude (Complete with sunglasses and backwards hat)
  • Willingness to not be the Hartford Wolfpack
Bonus points to those who have no problem sucking up for fan support. 

These teams will be rewarded with:

  • More favorable coverage
  • Ridicule of clear defined rival  on blog
  • Greater defined interest in this blog
  • More games covered throughout the season for game recap blogs
  • My love and affection which is priceless
  • Knowing that they probably aren't the Hartford Wolfpack
Teams or fans of teams may curry favor through Twitter tweets @dmeczywor, or in the comment section below. Hartford Wolfpack need not apply.

Thursday, September 3, 2015

Team Name

I'm being petty about this now. But this one can be much shorter because really, what's in a name?

Atlantic: Springfield Falcons
Fair Use. TheAHL
This one I may be a little biased towards. Springfield has been through plenty of name changes but Falcons are actually part of the city's iconography. Growing up in the area everyone got into a tizzy because there was a nest of  Peregrine Falcons that somehow captured the heart of the city. They still have the Falcon cam on top of Monarch place. It was just one of those weird things everyone seemed to care about for a bit when I was a kid. I don't know if it was a marketing stunt for the name change or not but it was still kinda interesting. It's a name that actually reflects the city its in very well, and because I don't live near cities in other divisions, its probably the only city to get the benefit.

Runner-up - Soundtigers.. I don't know what a Soundtiger is but it sounds fierce.

North: Rochester Americans
Fair use: The AHL


Canada has two NHL teams named after, well, Canadians. One of which may or may not be a slur, the other isn't even spelled right. That is why its so nice to see a team in America that does the ethnic name right. Not misspelled. Not some slur. Just Americans. For a team that is predominantly Canadian. It's a bit of a misnomer... But a misnomer done right!

Runner-up: St. Johns IceCaps. It sounds Hockey-ish.

Central: Lake Erie Monsters
Fair use. The AHL

It just reminds me of how cryptozoology is a thing that exists and that they look for lake monsters. Its also an area appropriate name because Bessie is a legendary creature out there so its region specific and has that extra oomph of meaning. Plus I still don't know what the hell an Ice Hog is.

Runner-Up: Manitoba Moose. Alliteration? Check. Northern winter animal? Check. Name that can be bellowed at games? Check. Yeah, its a solid name all around.

Pacific: San Diego Gulls
Fair Use. The AHL


It's an odd choice. An interesting choice. While logistically I don't want to cheer for it, I just feel like its calling to me for some reason. I just don't get it. I hate seagulls. But I like the San Diego Gulls for some reason. That said, a few years ago the Wolfpack re-branded themselves as the Whale and changed it back when that failed. If any team could get away with it and go gangbusters in this post Anchorman world, its San Diego. But they don't have to because gulls works enough for me.

Runner-up: San Antonio Rampage The rest are mostly just retreads or kinda lame. Condors are on the verge of extinction. I do like Barracuda enough to call it second runner up because of, well, Jaws and the Heart song. But Rampage is first runner up, because of, you know, Archer.

Wednesday, September 2, 2015

Best Mascot

Going off of a post from yesterday, I'm going to continue to judge the AHL teams by their aesthetics in the hopes that it will help me choose a team to cheer for. Today it is the mascots. Some of you may be crying foul since the mascots often appear in the logo, but I'll forgive your ignorance since a mascot on paper is not a mascot in real life and what looks good in Microsoft Paint, may be the stuff that gives children's nightmares in real life.

Lets get to it.

Atlantic: Hershey Bears




It's name is Coco! Open and shut.

Fine, I'll consider the others. Remember that thing  I said before? About logos looking good on paint but mascots being the stuff of nightmares? Check and mate is the Phantoms mascot, which looks like tye-dye fanatic. I would say google it, but don't. It's like doing a google image search to self diagnose a wart. It can't be unseen. The Falcons mascot is also equally angry.  Penguins was a deranged muppet looking creature with eyes and no head. The providence mascot is also kinda scary. Most of them were scary, but the Portland Pirates pulled up one good design and one bad design so to be safe, they both lose. The Wolfpack and Soundtiger mascots were surprisingly good, but...

IT'S NAME IS COCO AND IT LIVES IN HERSHEY!

North: Toronto Marlies




Surprisingly hard. So, easy ones to dismiss, Ice caps. I like the puffin, but don't make it look so sad. Then again, it lives in Utica, so maybe that's just a sad place to be. Senators, you mascot looks like an axe murdering cartoon character. Rochester, your moose looks like its on pain killers. This is an intervention. As for the real contenders, Albany, you were so close but the dog is just too fat and fat people make me sad, but overall really good. Utica, I really like your Alien design, compared to the Lehigh Night Terror, you get it right, but ultimately Marley in his latest state is just simple enough to work. I would say tie, but I think of it this way, which one looks more hugable? Sure, I may want to have a drink with the Utica mascot, but the Marlies mascot is just more approachable. Just don't Google Syracuse Crunch's old mascot.

Central: Iowa Wild




Dear god, how many of them want to eat children?

All of them. All of them do. But more importantly, why is the Lake Erie Monsters mascot a bird? And if it had to be a bird, why did it have to be a bird that eats children? What the hell goes on in the
Midwest to make these things acceptable? Wild gets it because the only one that wasn't angry, or had eyes proportional to its head. I'm looking a you checkers mascot!

Pacific: San Antonio Rampage




Uhmm, San Diego, I can see the face of a person in your mascot. Just letting you know, it kinda loses the effect... Oh, and if I can trust the words of John Hammond, Condors are on the verge of extinction, and I can see why base on how ugly that mascot is. That said, this was the hardest division to choose a favorite mascot. For one, I don't think the Stars or the Barracuda have one yet. The heat mascot is so stupid I almost chose it on principal alone, but it really came down to San Antonio and the Reign. San Antonio's mascot with its bare white eyes makes me feel like I'm looking at an actual cartoon, and the effect is almost hypnotic. The reign on the other hand have a dark knight who rides an ATV and slays dragsons. It is clear cut winner. But, evidence on the facebook page makes me think that the dark knight might be getting retired, so on the basis of not being sure, I have to declare San Antonio the winner.

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Best Logo

This is just a dumb side-commentary, just me thinking about what teams I feel like I should invest most of my time, and I'm judging right now on the most shallow criteria possible:

Looks.

I mentioned in an earlier blog where aesthetics are key, so its important. So, my choices for best logos from each division.

Atlantic: Lehigh Valley Phantoms.

Fair use
This is kinda a hard one bt the Phantom being the Flyer logo twice was a nice touch. But then again, the competition was a jacked up/drugged out penguin, a decent entry with the Falcons logo, a cat and a dog that don't look distinct enough from eachother, a classy bear, an overly complicated pirate and less effective retread of the Bruins logo.

North: Syracuse Crunch

Fair Use
This one was a little bit easier. There were some very classy ones such as the Rochester Americans which evokes patriotism and reminds me of Captain America. The Utica Comets is distinct and reminiscent of an actual NHL logo in many ways, and the Albany Devils retread is kinda cool in how it works out, almost better that the NHL devils logo. As for the rest, IceCaps are just meh, the Senators are kinda scary looking, and the Toronto Marlies are like the Bruins in that they aren't a fun retread of the NHL logo. Syracuse Crunch however is just a neat superhero design that brings me back to my days as a kid reading Silver Surfer. And since as a kid I didn't read Captain America, the Silver Surfer design is closer to my heart.

Central: Iowa Wild
Fair use: Public Domain

Ugh, I so want this one to be a tie. The Charlotte checkers logo is so nice in how it evokes a real top-grade team feel. Its the sort of logo that can really go on a hat. Simple but distinct. But that said the Wild Logo is just classy. It has that warm, rustic feel to it that makes me feel at home. It is just a great example of how the NHL logo works well with the AHL logo. Plus compared to Insanity Wolf Meme (whom WILL eat your children), angry moose (whom will also eat your children, albietly more slow), the lake monster whom will eat your children provided they go swimming, your friendly cartoon skull and cross-bones adamant on feeding your children poison, and finally biker pig and generic griffin whom probably won't hurt your children, but will probably be dicks to them none-the-less, the wild logo is just pretty and non-threatening. I could look at it all day.

 You have two fantastic standouts among a sea of duds. I don't want to have to choose. Screw it. It's a tie.

Fair use
Pacific: San Diego Gulls

Fair Use

This was perhaps the easiest of them all. Attitude Barracuda, is just a 90s video game reject I feel, Rampage is classy but lacks flair, Condors is too complicated, Heat and Ontario retreads suck, and while the Stars retread works, it isn't enough to overcome the originality of the Gulls logo. It feels like its out of a Mighty Ducks movie, which brings the AHL back to a more kid friendly state of mind. At least one infinitely more kid friendly than the Central division.

Monday, August 31, 2015

AHL Twitter wars

AHL twitter is something that immediately caught my eye. While NHL twitter is usually specific to team and team events, AHL seems more relaxed. Memes, gifs, jokes, its a more fun.

For example, when waiting for the schedule's release:




 While you might occasionally get a team to call out another on twitter in the large but the opening game, teams were throwing out little tweets like this:




Its silly stupid but its fun. I guess if the schedule isn't going to encourage a rivalry, the social media can. 

PS: The twitter beef between the Falcons and Wolfpack was gold...




But the tweet below sucks. Clean it up Hartford.


 As a side note, you can follow me on twitter @dmeczywor. I assure you I will offer you nothing of value there.