Showing posts with label Unrelated. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Unrelated. Show all posts

Saturday, October 24, 2015

Unrelated: The Importance of Gender in Horror

I am a HUGE movie buff, and particularly am a fan of horror. Part of the reason I'm not blogging every day right now is because of how much time I'm contributing to my annual horror fest. (Really, with local Frank Vatrano, the Moose and Falcons winless, you would think I would be talking more about that, but no...)

One of the big things in modern horror has been the gender politics. Really, its one of the more interesting things about the genre. That and the fact that the heroes are often the villains, and that often horror is just dark comedy in disguise, but that can be different discussions. 


Early on, monster movies were predominantly male driven, often science fiction with damsels in distress, then as we all know the story, Halloween came on to the scene (Though more accurately, Black Christmas and Texas Chainsaw Massacre,) and the Slasher genre was born. Halloween did a lot right, and it set the pace for a formula that would be come the standard about two years later when the Slasher boom was on with Friday the 13th and Prom Night honing in on that formula. More surprising, it became the genre standard even beyond slashers. See: Alien


If we start breaking down a lot of the hit horror movies post Halloween, there is no doubt a huge trend towards the "Final Girl" trope. The Final Girl trope is the trope horror has built its name on now, but it is the house bad horror is built upon. Let's take a look at some of the more successful modern horror titles since and see if the trend can hold.:

Nightmare on Elm Street: 2 Male, 2 Female, Female hero
Evil Dead: 3 Female, 2 Male, Male hero
Faculty: 3 female, 3 male, male hero
Alien: 2 female, 5 male, female hero, male top-billed
Hellraiser: 2 female, 2 male, female hero
The Thing: All male cast
Final Destination: Male hero in one, female in two.
Scream: 3 female, 4 male, female hero

Am I cherry picking a bit? Probably, but the point is good horror isn't necessarily built on the trope. When it is a female lead, it isn't usually a ditz either. Nancy in Nightmare reads up on self defense and home built traps. Ripley is a tough, often by the books co-captain who almost prevents the Xenomorph from ever getting on the ship.

Again, all well known, why is this important?

We are out of the slasher era and moving into an era dictated by remakes (and a huge influx of found footage films). Two films on that list above, The Thing and Evil Dead have shifted the gender of their heroes and cast from male heroes to female heroes and its sexist. Let me revise that, the final girl trope is sexist as a whole. Ok, digging myself deeper. Why don't I just let Joss Whedon and Drew Goddard explain for me:

"The virgin's death is optional, as long as it's last. The main thing is that she suffers."
-Cabin in the Woods

The way Hollywood utilizes the Final Girl trope isn't about empowering female, or writing smart women in general. It's about victimizing women for our entertainment. On top of it, its usually a sign of lazy writing. The Thing reboot was exhibit A. They threw a female lead in there because of genre expectations. Male characters can also be poorly written, but aren't usually subjected to the same psycho-sexual torture female characters are subjected to. (Alien being a great exception and example of this since John Hurt is more or less a rape victim in it, plus phallic Alien. It's kinda a movie about a rape victim beating rape, but not a la I Spit on Your Grave.) 

Furthermore, in order to defeat a monster in a horror movie, characters have to over come their flaws and weaknesses. That is what makes a good character in any movie, and by extension a good movie. Male characters often are put in their situation because of transgressions. See: Saw. Female characters are in their situation usually because they're female. Usually an initial encounter is escaped through luck. The flaw they have to overcome is being female. (Halloween was a little guilty of this too.) That isn't good writing, it isn't good horror. 

Again, I don't want all male led horror movies. I want horror to take off the training wheels and understand that it can utilize gender better for the messages in its movies, and be real horror. Good horror as gender balance and when it does it right it is perhaps the most progressive genre. It is frustrating to see how all the examples listed above could get it correct, and then they feed it it into the money machine, it changes around  and remove that balance, or not see that it has to exist. 

Is it really something that is all too important? Not really, silly movies usually. But hey, it's tropes, trends, and something worth noticing and thinking about. The more the audience thinks, the better our movies can get. 

Monday, October 12, 2015

Unrelated: LUEser

This is published post #42. For those of you who don't know, this number is very important. It is the answer to life the universe and everything. As to what the question is, nobody really knows.

Creative Commons: Darla
This is the point in time where I recommend Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, either the book or the radio broadcast, not the movie. So rarely does one find a piece of literature so optimistic and joyful while being entrenched in nhilistic absurdist philosophy (save for maybe Vonnegut, but even still he's much darker). At least as optimistic and joyful a book can be while still having earth destroyed within the first hundred or so pages.

The book series is chaos theory start to finish, where the random and the insanity get set to the march of Humanity. When humanity gets boiled down to its simplest form it gets exposed for how silly it all is. It's what good observational humor does and HHG2G has some of the best around. In it it explains why a miracle fish disproves god's existence by proving his existence, how the universe has a population of zero, and the importance of telephone sanitizers.

Is there a point to this blog other than me saying to read a book series I've been enthralled with since a kid? No. Do I wish I could do a better tribute to it? Yes. But sometimes I just need to let  it be.

Saturday, September 19, 2015

Unrelated: Self-Conscious Computers

Yeah, this kind of blog series...
Creative Commons Bill Alldredge
Unrelated is series of posts I run on the weekends that are unrelated to the AHL, the NHL or hockey. Consider it the weekend work I put in to help entertain. It could be humorous, personal, opinionated, political, related to other sports or anything. More or less these are my "Andy Rooney" moments.

This week, at the zero hour of a long weekend, here's an opinion you've never heard before: ratings on the internet are hollow and meaningless.

There are two types of ratings on the internet. 5 stars and 1/no stars. Everything else in between doesn't exist. You have to either love a movie on Netflix or scorn it so it burns into the ground. The real rating sometimes comes somewhere in the between because the more people that five star it will become averaged with the no stars and so forth.

All the ratings options that exist on the 5 pt scale


But why does it have to be so binary? Are we so in love with the 1/5 scale that we can't think things are average? It takes the concept of quality, the real question and makes what we see as either great! or terrible. While all feedback in general comes in two flavors, good or bad, there are degrees that such extremes can't validate.

I've always been of the opinion of scaled ranking. Was it average? 3 stars. was it good? Maybe a 4. I try to reserve only the life changing good or bad for the 5s or the 1s. If you can find a flaw, don't give it a five. If you still enjoy the app in the littlest bit, give it more than a 1 when a bug crashes it.

This is at the point where the ratings are devalued as computer programs and companies are looking for more numbers, more fives when they should be looking for more feedback. They get self conscious about 4s when all it means was good but not the revolution. I've been asked why I thought the service wasn't good enough over a 4. Called at home and at work over those rankings for local services.

 You can't hop into an app without a daily ask for a rating. It devalues the system because its enforced feedback is set to the extremes and the livelihood is based upon perfect scores when there should be room for good, bad, great, terrible and mediocre.  I'm ok with not being impressed all the time, and honestly, those fives probably aren't all impressed either. I'm not impressed nearly as much by them as you think I should be.